样书申请
* 申请人: | |
* 详细地址: | |
* 数量: | |
* 手机号码: | |
邮箱: | |
1.请在地址处注明您所在单位和职务.2.申请提交后,工作人员稍后和您联系. |
POD订购
* 订购人: | |
* 详细地址: | |
* 数量: | |
* 手机号码: | |
邮箱: | |
- 内容简介
- 目录
- 读者反馈
- 图书推荐
目录
序0
艾克瑞斯(Ecorys)公司简介0
About Ecorys0
第1章 执行摘要1
1.1 简介1
1.2 背景1
民事安全和防务市场5
定义和框架9
1.3 案例研究及具备高衍生潜力的技术领域13
案例研究13
具有高协同潜力的功能区域21
1.4 发展军民协同的经济/商业模型21
1.5 政策选择和影响评估25
政策选择25
影响评估结果29
其他政策选择33
1.6 建议35
第2章 内容37
2.1 背景37
2.2 定义43
2.3 民事安全——军事协同的概念框架45
2.4 民事安全和防务市场之间的差异51
第3章 目标和方法55
3.1 目的和目标55
目的55
目标和任务55
3.2 功能区分类57
3.3 案例研究59
3.4 对精选案例的深度分析61
3.5 协同潜力最大的功能区63
3.6 经济模型65
3.7 政策选择和影响评估65
3.8 结论和建议65
第4章 案例研究67
4.1 简介67
4.2 广泛的调研69
4.3 深入的案例研究85
4.3.1 案例1:中子管/SODERN公司【核生化爆】87
4.3.2 案例2:红外相机【传感系统和(传感器)信息处理】91
4.3.3 案例3:IRIS【身体防护/C3】97
4.3.4 案例4:虹膜扫描技术(传感器系统和【传感器】信息处理)101
4.3.5 案例5:C3技术和快速三维绘图——萨博【C3/训练&模拟】107
4.3.6 案例6:便携式防空系统防护【物理防护】115
4.3.7 案例7:守卫者M【防护服】123
4.3.8 案例8:泰瑟枪【非致命武器】129
4.3.9 案例9:月神无人机(平台)133
4.3.10 案例10:数据二极管——Fox-IT【网络防护】141
4.3.11 案例研究的主要经验教训145
第5章 具有高协同潜力的功能区域155
5.1 概述155
5.2 标准157
5.2.1 类似的工作需求/要求157
5.2.2 技术层次159
5.2.3 市场吸引力161
5.2.4 联合研发163
5.2.5 其他可能的标准165
5.3 评估165
第6章 军民协同行业评估的总框架(经济模型)169
6.1 简介169
6.2 概述:总体范围、概念和定义169
6.2.1 识别潜在军民技术协同的两种方法:“自上而下"与“自下而上"方法171
6.2.2 企业层面和技术层面的军民协同175
6.2.3 技术研发与基于生产的军民协同177
6.2.4 发展军民协同的商业模型185
6.3 影响行业(企业)军民(安全)技术协同和市场多元化的因素与条件191
6.3.1 公司跨市场寻求发展技术协同和多元化的一般要求195
6.3.2 影响安全和防务之间技术性协同的具体因素和条件197
6.4 结论207
第7章 政策选择的描述209
7.1 介绍209
7.2 通过《欧洲安全与防务框架合作协议》进行更系统性地协调211
7.3 推广混合标准211
7.4 建立高级利益相关者团体217
7.5 《欧盟运行条约》185条款219
7.6 其他政策选择219
第8章 影响评估223
8.1 当前的防务和安全市场223
8.2 军事和民事安全研发225
8.3 军民协同229
8.4 影响评估233
8.4.1 基准选择235
8.4.2 根据《欧洲安全与防务框架合作计划协议》进行更系统的协调239
8.4.3 推广混合标准243
8.4.4 成立高级利益相关者团体253
8.4.5 《欧盟运行条约》(TFEU)185条款261
8.4.6 评分与总结263
8.5 一些典型区域军民协同影响的定量分析267
8.5.1 范例说明了什么269
8.5.2 总体影响是什么279
8.6 总体评估285
第9章 结论和建议291
9.1 对防务——民事安全协同现状的评论291
9.2 未来(增长)的协同机遇295
9.3 政策选择及其影响299
1 Executive Summary2
1.1 Introduction2
1.2 Background2
Civil security and defence markets6
Definitions and Framework10
1.3 Case Studies and Technology Areas with high spin-off Potential14
Case studies14
Functional areas with high potential for synergies22
1.4 Economic/Business Models for Developing Civil-Military Synergies22
1.5 Policy Options and Impact Assessment26
Policy Options26
Results of the impact assessment30
Other policy options34
1.6 Recommendations36
2 Context38
2.1 Background38
2.2 Definitions44
2.3 Conceptual framework for civil security-military synergies46
2.4 Differences between the civil security and defence markets52
3 Aim and Approach56
3.1 Aim and objectives56
Aim56
Objectives and Tasks56
3.2 Taxonomy of functional areas58
3.3 Case studies60
3.4 In-depth analysis of selected cases62
3.5 Functional areas with the largest potential for synergies64
3.6 Economic models66
3.7 Policy options and Impact Assessment66
3.8 Conclusions and recommendations66
4 Case studies68
4.1 Introduction68
4.2 Broad scan70
4.3 In-depth case studies86
4.3.1 Case 1:Neutron tubes/SODERN [CBRNE]① 88
4.3.2 Case 2:Infrared Cameras [sensor systems and (sensor) information processing]① 92
4.3.3 Case 3:IRIS [physical protection/C3]① 98
4.3.4 Case 4:Iris Scan Technology [sensor systems and (sensor) information processing]102
4.3.5 Case 5:C3 Technologies and Rapid 3D Mapping-SAAB [C3/Training&Simulation]① 108
4.3.6 Case 6:Protection against MANPADS [Physical protection]116
4.3.7 Case 7:Defender M [Protective clothing]124
4.3.8 Case 8:Taser [Non-lethal weapons]130
4.3.9 Case 9:LUNA UAV (Platforms)134
4.3.10 Case 10:Data diode-Fox-IT [Cyber protection]142
4.3.11 Main lessons from the case studies146
5 Functional areas with large potential for synergies156
5.1 Overview156
5.2 Criteria158
5.2.1 Similar Operational Needs/Requirements158
5.2.2 Technology Level160
5.2.3 Market Attractiveness162
5.2.4 Joint R&D164
5.2.5 Other Possible Criteria166
5.3 Assessment166
6 General Framework for Industry Assessment of Civil-military Synergies (Economic Models)170
6.1 Introduction170
6.2 Overview:general scope,concepts and definitions170
6.2.1 "Top-down" versus "bottom-up" approaches to the identification of potential civil-military technology synergies172
6.2.2 Firm-level versus technology-level civil-military synergies176
6.2.3 Technology development versus production-based civil-military synergies178
6.2.4 Business modes for developing civil-military synergies186
6.3 Factors and conditions influencing industry (company) approaches to civil (security)-military technology synergies and market diversification192
6.3.1 General requirements for firms seeking to develop technology synergies and diversification across markets196
6.3.2 Specific factors and conditions influencing technology-based synergies between security and defence198
6.4 Conclusions208
7 Description of Policy Options210
7.1 Introduction210
7.2 More and more systematic coordination under EFC212
7.3 Promote Hybrid standards212
7.4 Establish a high-level stakeholder group218
7.5 Use Article 185 TFEU220
7.6 Other policy options220
8 Impact Assessment224
8.1 The current defence and security market224
8.2 Military and civil security R&D226
8.3 Civil-military synergies230
8.4 Assessment of impacts234
8.4.1 Baseline option236
8.4.2 More systematic coordination under EFC240
8.4.3 Promote hybrid standards244
8.4.4 Establish a High Level Stakeholder Group254
8.4.5 Use Article 185 TFEU262
8.4.6 Scoring and summary264
8.5 Quantitative impact assessment of civil-military synergies for some typical areas268
8.5.1 What the examples show270
8.5.2 What is the overall impact280
8.6 Overall assessment286
9 Conclusions and Recommendations292
9.1 Observations on the current state of defence-civil security synergies292
9.2 Opportunities for (increased) future synergies296
9.3 Policy options and their impact300
附录1 来源307
附录2 缩略语表311
Annex 2 List of Acronyms312